Real Estate


Forbes reports that Texas has three of the best cities to work in the nation.  Dallas, Houston and Austin are among the top cities to earn a living while also keeping living costs down.   Being a native Texan for many years it has never been lost on me how inexpensive Dallas is compared to cities like Seattle, New York and L.A.  The cost of living in those cites has been a game changer for me at least twice during my career. 

There are some interesting things to think about and perspectives to ponder.

  • If I were a policymaker in a competing state I would probably want to take a close look at my home state and how it compares to to Texas.  I would be interested in finding ways to attract more employers and job hunters.
  •  

  • Which came first? The chicken or the egg?  Did these employers setup shop here because of a good stock of skilled talent or whas the initial move a cost-benefit one where taxes and state provided incentives were offered?
  •  

  • Forbes did not publish (or at least I did not see it) their data tables but I would be interested to see how each city in their list ranked in terms of transportation options.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Technology Review reports today about a new energy aware internet routing process.  Some folks at MIT, Carnegie Mellon and Akamai looked into energy price fluctuations and data center loads across the country to see if there could be any cost savings to rerouting data from high cost data centers to lower cost ones.  Their results have shown that large Internet companies like Google, Microsoft and Amazon could save up to 40% on their electricity bills – millions of dollars in savings.

They don’t mention any details as to how the ’smart routing algorithim’ works but my guess is that they are using decision tree learning with a heuristic algorithm like ID3 or C4.5.  Their model would probably need some way to factor in arbitrage opportunities within the electricity markets on a real time basis while simultaneously tracking data-center loads.  One of the problems they mention that holds this technology back is that most data-centers today lack the ability to throttle power usage with loads – in other words, the servers need to be able to consume a fraction of their full load power when idle.

What are some potential implications for the future?

New market opportunities for those firms that can offer the hardware solutions to make servers ‘energy elastic’.

This could be a boon for the software cloud, as network computing could take advantage of these routing systems to find the least costly resource.  Remember back in college when you had to use one of the computer labs?  It was basically a room full of computer stations made available for everything from creating presentations to developing software applications.  Now imagine if each of the computers in that room costs a different amount to use.  The ideal thing to do would be to walk around the room to find the cheapest one – of course making sure that it has the needed capabilities.  I can imagine a situation where cloud software would locate the least costly computing resource for a given task anywhere around the country or world just as I would walk around that computer lab searching for the cheapest available station.

I’m speculating here but could this lead to a normalization of electricity prices across the country as data centers compete for locating and using lower cost centers?  I was only able to find one 2005 article mentioning that data centers consumer about 1.5% of all U.S. electricity.  I think it would be a fair guess that today’s number might be closer to 2% or higher.  If so then how would that impact states that currently have lower electricity rates?  Lots of potential externalities here to contemplate.

The article also mentions that energy companies could negotiate with large internet firms in advance of expected peak loads to mitigate potential outages or problems.  Energy companies could essentially ’shape’ their loads to prevent failures or outages.

A problem I see with this technology is that if it is used extensively in a decentralized manner then most of the cost savings could evaporate quickly.  I know what you are thinking here, “but that is to be expected.  Its simple supply and demand here – increase the use of product x over product y until the marginal cost reaches marginal benefit”. 

Here is my problem:
If every party acted independently and outside of a central market or clearinghouse then the anticipated savings would be lost to transactions costs.  These transactions costs being those associated with moving data from one place to another and doing so with incomplete information. Take for example if an underutilized data center pops up on the radar of ten or so Internet companies.  They each, independently and unbeknownst to the others, make the move to the new data center.  This surge in load may lead to an increase in costs and therefore mute any cost savings.  There could even be a potential for some Internet companies to have to move yet again - further increasing the cost of the move.

I think that a centralized market or clearinghouse for this type of transaction would facilitate this form of intelligent routing.  Of course, I am no expert in data center economics or how or if some of these problems or opportunities are realistic.  But with my limited knowledge they would be questions I would ask.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

I cannot help but notice the unending stream of repetitive news reports commenting about how housing prices are falling and sales are declining.  Every time I read one of these reports I find myself asking, “Who writes these things?  Are they serious? (more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Back in the late 90’s and early 2000 the rage was making a quick buck in the stock market. You could throw a dart at a moving stock ticker and still make money. Authors, talk show hosts, and other ‘experts’ abounded in their availability and willingness to share their winning methods. Day trading became the new buzzword, as a new breed of its constituents threw caution to the wind and staked their fortunes on the concept that profit was just an abstract idea and that it created itself out of thin air. (more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

President Truman must be rolling in his grave.  We have become a society enthralled with the notion that responsibility lies…… way over there.  Burn yourself on HOT coffee at McDonalds?  Easy, just sue them for serving you hot coffee.  Suffer hearing loss from listening to your iPod to loud?  No problem, stick it to Apple for creating ADJUSTABLE volume controls. (more…)

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

I was impressed with Bush’s presentation – well done; but I am not moved. He continues to polarize and aggitate. He continues to call anyone who disagrees with him a defeatist, isolationist (incorrectly), or a protectionist.

America is a great nation, but I think it should be more humble; and that includes refraining from saying things like ‘we are the envy of nations’.

He mentioned lots of new initiatives as well as the effects of previous ones. Again, I am not moved. Why he would mention the succes of the No Child Left Behind Act when he has continued to stifle it by not funding it adequately, I can only guess. He says that our economy is doing well… well, I am not a doomsdayer, but I think the jury is still out on that one.  Hold off for a little longer Mr. President.

You see, while you mention GDP I think about higher interest rates and how that will affect spending (the engine of choice in our current economy) as well as how higher short term interest rates will affect the housing market in the long run. I am also deeply concerned about stagnant wage growth and the increasing gap between the rich and poor.

Instead of giving the nation a real state of the union address, he gave us a sugar coated pep talk. When I buy shares of stock in public companies, I listen to the quarterly conference calls made by the top level executives. I, as well as most other prudent investors, tend to respect and give credibility to those executives that highlight their mistakes and problem areas and how they will be addressed. Those executives that simply walk up to the podium and say, “everythings going great guys” deserve that much more scrutiny.

After all, didn’t Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling say that everything was ok?

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post